Booker prize-winning author Arundhati Roy launched a scathing attack on Monday on the "aggressive nationalism" behind the anti-corruption drive led by hunger-striking campaigner Anna Hazare.
In a column entitled "I'd rather not be Anna" published in The Hindu newspaper, the novelist, essayist and rights activist condemned both the style and substance of Hazare's campaign that has mobilised public opinion in India.
In particular she questioned Hazare's use of the hunger strike and other tactics and symbols co-opted from his hero -- India's independence icon Mahatma Gandhi.
"While his means may be Gandhian, Anna Hazare's demands are certainly not," Roy said.
The focus of Hazare's protest is a new anti-corruption bill.
The 74-year-old activist says the current draft is too weak and wants parliament to pass his own version which gives more scope and power to an ombudsman who would monitor politicians, bureaucrats and the judiciary.
While agreeing that the government bill was so flawed "that it was impossible to take seriously", Roy said Gandhi would have been dismayed by Hazare's vision of an all-powerful, centralised ombudsman.
"It will function as an independent administration, meant to counter the bloated, unaccountable, corrupt one that we already have. Two oligarchies instead of one," Roy said.
Hazare, who has not eaten for six days and took his fast public on Friday, has drawn huge crowds to the open air venue where he is staging his hunger strike in central Delhi.
The atmosphere is one of celebratory protest, with the crowds singing along to patriotic songs and waving the Indian national flag.
But Roy, a vocal government critic, said she was dismayed by "the props and the choreography, the aggressive nationalism" of the Hazare movement.
"They signal to us that if we do not support the fast, we are not 'true Indians'," she said.
"Who is he really, this new saint, this Voice of the People?" she asked, accusing Hazare of remaining silent on other issues like farmers' suicides in his home state of Maharashtra.
"He does however support Raj Thackeray's Marathi Manoos xenophobia and has praised the 'development model' of Gujarat's CM who oversaw the 2002 pogrom against Muslims. (Anna withdrew that statement after a public outcry, but presumably not his admiration.)," she further writes in the article titled, I'd rather not be Anna.
The article has triggered an avalanche of response on the newspaper's online site. Most comments to her article are critical. A reader S Bala writes, "Let Ms Roy understand that it is people's satyagraha and Anna Hazare is used as a tool. The democracy in 65 years created more thugs and goondas. The election is fought with money power and not on value basis. Then people don't have any means to fight or vent their feelings but to go behind Anna who is honest and a Gandhian." A few readers have also supported her. "Thank God for a sane voice during the 'Anna is India' mania," writes Rupinder Singh.
About Author / Additional Info:
My name is Md Anas Khan and i am a writer. I have completed my gradation from Cambridge university. I have wrote at least 1000 plus articles for magazine, newspaper and media.
